Genre

Thursday, July 26, 2012

A Trip to the Allergist [reminiscence]

*

**


***

1

When I was growing up in Central Texas, I had persistent problems with pollen allergies.  We didn't know what in particular I was allergic to, but it seemed that anytime, any day, my eyes could start itching, or I could start sneezing, or my chest could become congested - having an asthma attack, we said - or I could have to blot my runny nose every couple of minutes.  Mother used to say it was worst when the many wild and domestic cedar bushes in the Hill Country all around my hometown were blooming... but I didn't know any plant bloomed year round!

My sneezing would sometimes get so bad I would injure my neck and shoulder, and for days I'd have "a crick in my neck," sometimes very painfully. 

The pediatrician always prescribed Benedryl, but that made me sleepy.  So I took it only when I was feeling sort of desperate... unless my parents insisted.

I read somewhere that a youngster with a tendency to "hay fever" would outgrow it in her or his early twenties, and that it would return in one's forties or fifties.  And sure enough, when I went north to college at 18, I did notice a remarkable reduction of my usual symptoms.  (I didn't want to think it was really the plants in my hometown that had been giving me such problems, but...) Oh, and headaches too; I didn't mention that my head congestion often gave me headaches, as a kid at home.

2

I wasn't entirely free of pollen allergy symptoms while I was in college, but the episodes did seem to come only during certain seasons.  I read then that some thought allergic reactions were brought on by stress.  It occurred to me that maybe my parents had known this theory too.

In those years I found some over-the-counter medicines that helped.  One had some caffeine in it, which I discovered was a good idea.  I had observed too that having coffee or tea, or a Coke (preferably a Dr. Pepper) would help, sometimes as much as a pill.  I took Chlorotrimeton for a time - prescribed by somebody - and Coricidin D, the one with the caffeine, was my pill of choice.

3

But still, in my - let's say - "early maturity,"  whether I was in the Midwest, Europe, the Northeast, or the West Coast, my allergies were everywhere what I thought of as "under control."  Even when I visited my family in Central Texas, always for only a few days at a time, I didn't ever feel as vulnerable as I'd had to earlier.

Then, five years after our marriage, A----- and I moved from the East Coast to one of the Great Lakes states.  My new job was in a small village, where we built a house and started our family.  The region was fairly swampy, but the village had grown up around one hill in the center.  Two distinctive features of the area were its black squirrels and the grove of oak trees on that central hill, who loved the acorns of course.

Even the logo of my employer was a stylized oak tree.  We were proud of it.  Our weekly newsletter was called "The Oak Leaf."

4

I was 33 when we made that move.  The allergy symptoms returned about at the level I remembered from childhood in Texas.  I thought it was too early for the return onslaught, and I got to know Coricidin D real well... as well as coffee.  But I was uncomfortable most of the time, some days worse than others.  We had a line of big pine trees marking the lot line next to our house, and my wife and I theorized that their blooming - seeing the waves of yellow pollen blowing around - must have been the cause of my discomfort.  This theory seemed to gain strength from my mother's theory about Texas cedar.  Well, pines and cedars are both evergreens, aren't they?

Always alert for new developments regarding allergies, I did know that considerable advances had been made in allergy treatments.  I'd heard about "scratch tests," where the doctors figured out just what it was that provoked the allergic reactions.  At that time, I didn't know what use could be made of this information. 

And of course, we weren't going to move away from our wonderful new house just because of a little discomfort to Daddy, even if testing should confirm our theory about the pines next door.

5

But after three or four years, we decided to look around to see if there was an allergy specialist around.  One way or another, we discovered a certain Dr. Brenneman in another small village about forty-five miles away.

But I was reluctant to call him.  I thought I should wait until there was at least a brief respite in my allergies.  I thought it would screw up the examination and the tests if I was at or near my worst.  The episodes couldn't last forever, could they? But for a long time, I didn't feel any let-up.

Then, finally I was feeling better, so I made an appointment with Dr. Brenneman.  The intake was pretty standard - a lot of paperwork focusing mainly on my allergy history, a quick encounter with a nurse who weighed me, took my temperature and blood pressure, and told me I had done the right thing coming to the renowned Dr B. even if his office was kind of far from my home.

After a while the doctor himself hustled in, his hands full of the pages of history I had carefully written out.  He went through my allergy history of the last year.  He would quietly ask a simple question like "when was your first episode this year?"  When I would say something like "late January or early February," he would seem to pounce and call out something like "January 29?!"

That seemed odd, but the specific dates he attached to my anecdotal memories all seemed credible, so, every time he hollered one out,  I said a simple "Yes."

"March 27?" he'd propose in his aggressive manner.  "Yes," I'd say, quietly.

"June 3?" "Yes."  (And so on.)

We wereviewed almost a whole year that way.  The exchange was challenging, interesting, and laborious.  But I was impressed.  "Boy!," I was thinking, "this man knows, he knows!"  (By the way, in the course of my review, Dr. Brenneman explained away our theory that the pine trees were the source of my problems.  It turns out that any pollen you can see is very unlikely to be breathed in, creating hay fever.  Such pollen is just too heavy, and simply falls to the ground.)

When we got through that part of my interview, the doctor pulled out a little pen light, tilted my head back and looked carefully up each nostril.  He didn't speak during this part.  Then, each ear.  He probably listened to my lungs too, but I don't particularly remember that.

Finally, he looked me in the eye and said, in that somewhat stentorian voice:  "You know you're sick, don't you?"

"Well, no," I said.  "I waited until I was feeling good for a change before coming in."

"You have forgotten what it's like," he said, "to feel good."

6

Well, that seemed credible too, I had to admit to myself.  I waited for more wisdom.

"Here's what we're going to do," Dr. Brenneman announced.  I later learned that he'd published a well-known book on food allergies, but at this time it surprised me when we did not move directly to the famed scratch tests.  "I have tested a special diet," he said, "consisting of a healthy combination of all the nutrients we need, but with only foods to which a tiny minority of people has ever reported allergic reaction."

I was listening, as he took a printed sheet from a little box on the desk.  "You eat nothing - and I mean nothing - but rice and beets for a week...and I guarantee, a guarantee you know, that you will feel like a new man" (emphasis added by him).

I was looking over the printed diet instructions and absorbing what he said.  I would like feeling "like a new man" after all, especially now that I knew I was sick right at the time I thought I was feeling fine.

"Rice and beets," he repeated emphatically. "You can have some tea if you need to, but with your meals you should have only water... Do you think your wife will do this for you?"

Of course, I was sure, if that was what was needed for my health and well-being.  I didn't even wonder right away whether if I did feel like a new man after a week, I'd be eating nothing but rice and beets for my whole remaining life. 

But he evidently anticipated my worrying that.  "Then," he said, "when we know for proof positive," he said, "that your persistent allergies are indeed food-based, we'll start adding back to your diet various other foods, starting with those known to cause allergic reactions - like yours - for lots of people.  That way we can identify the foods you must avoid in order to continue healthy, symptom-free."

I now know that this approach is known as "the elimination diet," at that time the food allergy equivalent to the scratch test for air-born allergens   Anyway, I left Dr. B. vowing to cut out all foods except rice and beets, with an occasional cup of tea in-between meals.  In only a week, maybe I would feel like a new man.

7

Anyway, A----- faithfully fixed me a big plate of rice and beets every evening after a smaller plate of rice and beets at noon.  I can't remember if I skipped breakfast altogether, but that's unlikely.  Guess what I had for breakfast?

After a rather long week of this, I headed back for my follow-up conference with Dr. Brenneman.  I had to break the news to him that I didn't feel any different than I had the week before.  He acknowledged, then, that the source of my problems was not in my diet.  He may have been disappointed; I imagined he was.  But he said, "Now, here's what we will do," and he explained the scratch test routine: 

I could begin immediately in the lab across the lobby, a technician giving me a series of scratches on my back with a tiny drop of serum made from a variety of possible air-born allergies.  In a couple of days, I'd come back, and the technician would check the results.  The allergens I'd reacted to most would be administered later in a line across the back of my shoulder.  I believe he said that they used to test for 60 different alleregens, but that number had been reduced based on experience.

Yes, that turned to be true: I was tested for only 59!  My back was covered with new scratches from collar to belt-line.

A day or so later, when I took off my shirt for the technician, she said, "Oh!" implying that mine were unusual results.  She showed me a printed chart with the 59 scratches and their labels.  I'd had at least a minor response to 48 of them.  She marked them on the chart, then marked them on a chart she would give to Dr. Brenneman, noting by number how mild or how strong the reaction had been to each.

Although some molds, house dust, cat dander, and the like had provoked some reactions, almost all my allergens were various pollens... one of which was oak.  Dr. Brenneman later told me that oak was the only tree that bloomed year-round, at least in that region.

8

He himself was present at my next meeting with the technician.  He wanted to tell me that my reaction to ragweed, in two different species, had been severe enough so that he had decided to dilute the serum a drop of which was to be administered under the skin that day.  I can't remember which subcutaneous doses I was to receive, but it was fewer than a dozen.

Then, I was to return to the main waiting room for 30 minutes or so in order to give enough time for these pricks that afternoon to reveal how much I was allergic to them.  A serum customized just for me would finally be developed.

Perhaps I'd known that I would be cooling my heels for a time.  I had a paperback with me, and the time went by pretty fast.  After 20 minutes, or maybe longer, someone on Dr. Brenneman's staff happened to walk by, nodding to the several folks waiting there.  She paused as I greeted her, and I noticed that her eyes widened a bit.

"How are you feeling?" she asked.  When I said I was all right, her next question was "Can you breathe all right?"  I hadn't noticed any problem except for a slight headache and maybe a little eye strain.  She took my pulse.  She hadn't done this with anyone else, but I didn't know if anyone there had had the same tests as me.  "Now," she said firmly, "you just stay there.  Dr. Brenneman will be right with you."

One of the secretaries came right over to sit across from me.  She said the doctor would be coming soon.

The next thing I knew, Dr. Brenneman was looking up into my eyes.  He spoke gently and slowly.  "Now, here's what we're going to do.  Even though we diluted your serum to half strength, you're having a severe reaction."  He took something from the nurse behind him and looked back into my eyes.

He held up for me to see a huge syringe (I thought) as he said, "I'm going to put some adrenalin now directly into your heart.  That will protect you.  We'll see how you respond to that, and then decide what's next.  Do you understand and consent?"

Directly into my heart, eh?  I said, as cheerfully as I could, "Let's just wait a little while longer, okay?  I'm feeling all right.  Let's just give my body more time to calm down again."

And even though I was clearly causing a major disruption in the staff's normal routine, that's what we did.  I don't think anyone was delegated to sit right with me that whole time, but I presume staff members were keeping an eye on me.  Did I go back to my book?  Probably!

9



I later learned that I was showing symptoms of "anaphylactic shock," when one's neck swells, in the worst scenario growing so swollen that one's breathing is threatened.  I was still feeling pretty good, though, and managed to remain calm.

I don't know how much longer I sat there; I'm sure it was at least another half-hour, at which time the nurse reappeared with a stethoscope and a blood pressure cuff.  She said I looked much better, and I said I'd never felt really bad.  She came back in a few minutes and watched as I stood up.  I walked around a little (probably went to the bathroom).  Following instructions, I set up another appointment in a week or so with the doctor's secretary but was free to go, if I was really feeling okay.

I really was, so I went out to my car and drove the forty-five minutes or so back to the office.  I made it in time for my last scheduled committee meeting that day, which didn't last long.  I thought maybe I should knock off an hour early, said Goodbye to my secretary (who agreed it might be a good idea for me to leave), and went home.

10

Everyone at the doctor's office had been studiously calm.  No one had said anything unusual in my little meeting at work, and my secretary hadn't either.  So it was surprising when I walked in the kitchen door, and A----- flipped out.

"What happened?!" she exclaimed.  When she told me I looked terrible, I looked in the bathroom mirror.  My appearance was in fact considerably altered.  I looked puffy and pale.  My neck, A----- said, was as big as a piano leg.  I went upstairs for a little lie-down.  After supper and a good night's sleep, I was looking - and still feeling - normal again.  But it had been a dramatic experience, to say the least.

At my next appointment, the technician gave me a shot in the thigh consisting of an individualized mix of serum made from several of my worst allergens.  After a half-hour without any drama at all, I was free to go.

Dr. Brenneman said it was fine for the company nurse to administer my shots from then on.  His office would send me the serum whenever I ran out, and I would take it to the nurse for my shot.  This would be weekly for some period of time and then bi-weekly indefinitely.

So I ended up giving myself the shots for six or eight years.  I probably saw Dr. Brenneman at least one more time, but he just said to keep up with the shots.

11

Well, in a year or so - maybe I was by then down to a monthly shot - I noticed I was feeling better for longer periods of time than I had for decades.  By george, this desensitizination treatment was working!

Then, it was time to move on.  The family moved back East.  I had enough serum for a little while, but I began to get a little anxious about whether or not I could continue to get my usual supply from Dr. Brenneman's office.  I must have gotten it all right, but the local pharmacy seemed reluctant to sell me the insulin needles I needed without a prescription.

A----- found me a local allergist.  I explained my situation, but concluded by asking a question that hadni't really occurred to me before.

"How will we know whether the shots have accomplished all they can?"

He replied:  "There's only one way: you would have to stop having them."  He gave me the prescriptions I needed (or he got them from Dr. Brenneman; I don't remember), but I never had them filled. 

How I felt - and continued to feel - was good, better than "all right."  Now, I never even wonder anymore what it felt like - years ago - to be the "old man" I used to be and before I began to feel like a "new man."


*

**

***

Friday, July 13, 2012

Is Freedom More Important than Equality? [essay]

*

**

***

Which do you want more?

1

"Okay now, would you like chocolate? or strawberry?"

"Both!"

This is the conversation one imagines with a four-year-old at an ice-cream stand on a hot summer day.  And rather often in life, it seems that the right answer to "Which one?" is indeed "Both!"  Should a business - for example - do what serves the customer best? or what most rewards the most effective employees?  Well, the boss has to figure out how to do both, of course!  And all too often it's not easy to achieve both.

The even harder fact of life is that very often good objectives - such as, health and happiness, compassion and high standards, the individual and general society, virtue and love, emotion and reason... - very often, a pair of good objectives find themselves in tension with each other.  They are both good; we want...  both!

So how do you decide - if you have to - which is more important?

2


Even in divisive times like today, Americans profess - and seem to actually believe - that the fundamental goals we should all value are equality, life, liberty, and happiness.  Our most revered founding document tells us we should value these, and we don't seem to question its wisdom on this point.  All of us are created equal, and among our inherent rights are the right to live, the right to be free, and the right to seek to achieve happiness or well-being.

But in our public discourse today, two of these do seem to be in tension with each other, or even in opposition to each other: Equality and  Freedom.  We usually refer to both the value of equality of opportunity for all and the value of individual freedom for everyone, or at least every citizen.  Unfortunately, it seems painfully evident that we often have to choose between the two.

3

Freedom and Equality: believe it or not, the way we use these terms in public discourse today, both of these concepts are relative.

Take Freedom first. 

Surely, just about everyone knows the often quoted Supreme Court Justice's saying that we can't yell "Fire!" in a crowded auditorium.  Except for those kinds of freedom guaranteed by the Constitution, one's freedom is limited by the freedom of others and by the need for social order. In general I am not free to harm someone else, I am not free to violate the rights of others, I am not free to break the law, I am not free to steal or destroy someone else's property, and so on and so forth.

In a tyrannical state, the absolute ruler may be absolutely free; she or he can do anything he or she wants. But in a democracy, no one's freedom is absolute.

4

And what about Equality?

"Equal" is a relative term by definition. My height is equal or not equal to yours, and when the Declaration of Independence says that all people are created equal, it means "equal to all other people." That goes without saying, doesn't it?

Even if we were to say, "All of those fence posts are equal" (in height), we would still be using a relative term and would mean "equal to each other."  And if we were to say, "Those posts are absolutely equal," we would be using the word "absolutely" to mean "exactly" or "utterly," since there is no such thing - anywhere - as "absolute equality."

5

We hear a lot about freedom these days from angry people. "I value FREEDOM," one might say proudly or even defiantly, using the term more as a talisman or charm than as a meaningful concept. "Oh," the speaker expects his or her audience to think: "if that person values freedom, he must be a good person since freedom is good."  That speaker is not using the word "freedom" meaningfully but rhetorically, to achieve a certain effect rather than to communicate.

A specific example today would be those claiming that our current health-care law "violates religious freedom," since the law says that church-affiliated universities and social service organizations must continue to offer coverage of birth control drugs in their employee health insurance plans.  When someone says this, knowing that most Americans highly value religious freedom, she or he is not talking about everyone's freedom so much as trying to create the notion, "I'm a good person who values good things."

Someone else might say,"I want my freedom!" or "We have to take back America and restore our Freedom."   Looked at more closely, it becomes clear that this angry person wants to be "free" to decide what everyone, including everyone else, will do. That is true as well of those claiming violations of religious freedom, since they want to impose their religious principles on their, possibly non-religious employees.

Another example is the group calling themselves New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms, who have been working to have the law approving same-sex marriage thrown out. This is not really valuing freedom, but valuing one's own freedom to impose his or her will on others.

As a result, whenever a person says "I value FREEDOM," using one phrasing or another, we have to ask ourselves WHOSE freedom is being valued?  Our country's founding documents say we should value everyone's freedom, as we say "liberty for all" when pledging allegiance to our flag.

6

There is ambiguity in the concept of equality, too.

I remember Mr. Johnson, my 11th grade American History teacher, explaining to us that "All men are created equal" does not really mean that everyone is equal - as in of equal ability or equal height or weight - but that we are all born with an equal opportunity to pursue happiness. "All men are created," he said, "with an equal opportunity to prove themselves unequal."

And since it is obvious that we are not all born with equal intelligence, health, emotional sensitivity, or physical strength, what Mr. Johnson said seems a fair way to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence. It's not the person that's equal to all others but the person's opportunity that's equal to the opportunity of all others.

So when people are being careful with their words, they may say that all living Americans have - or should have - freedom of speech and religion, of voting for their government representatives confidentially, and so on. But they do not say we all are - or should be - equal; they say we all have - or should have - equal opportunity.


7

We started by saying that sometimes it seems Freedom and Equality-of-opportunity are in tension with or in opposition to each other. 

"Freedom is power," one often hears, but "power is Freedom" also.  One person may have more power - more economic power, for instance, (meaning more money) or more political power - than another person, and that means having more freedom to do as one chooses than those less powerful.  In other words, the less wealthy and the less politically "connected" have fewer opportunities to succeed than the more wealthy and politically influential.

On the other hand, the original Communists said that everyone should be equal; that is, everyone should receive what they need equitably and contribute as much as possible to the community.  In other words, everyone would be held to an equal standard of work and an equal standard of compensation.  But this situation - if it could ever be achieved - would significantly limit the individual's freedom to undertake personal initiatives; all initiatives would be designed to serve the community, not the individual.

In the capitalist system, of course, we know that limiting one's opportunity to "get ahead" also in practice limits the amount of material progress achieved in the community.  Choosing to expect everyone to meet an equal standard - or to achieve "equality" - would come at the sacrifice of individual freedom.

We in America have learned together that suppressing individuals' freedom in order to achieve equality will not work and inhibits human progress.  Following the assertions of our founding documents, we have also learned that suppressing some people's equality of opportunity in order to enhance the freedom of others is wrong and ineffective.

But we can see that in the practical world, as guides of our actions Freedom and Equality are in tension with each other in real and meaningful ways.

8

"Daddy" at the ice-cream stand could order his four-year-old one small scoop of strawberry and one small scoop of chocolate.  In that case, a little of both alternatives could be achieved.  That might be called a win-win situation in that little case, or it might be called a "compromise."

If "Daddy" were choosing for himself, he might want to consider the historical context.  Maybe, for instance, two days ago he had chocolate ice cream... and maybe the time before that too.  So he might say it's time to have his other favorite and order strawberry.

Politically or socially, these same two approaches should be possible: maybe at one time - such as, for instance, around 1900 (if not in 2012) - we might look around and say that we've been adopting laws and practices favoring higher and higher rewards to those at the wealthy and powerful end of the scale, freeing them to satisfy their every whim, but at the same time tending to overlook the legitimate need of others for more nearly equal opportunities to succeed.  In such a situation, we might want to act in accord with our professed belief that both freedom and equality are important and to shift our focus more toward achieving "equal opportunity for all."

"Daddy's" compromise of ordering one small scoop of chocolate and one of strawberry is another approach to achieving "Both" equal opportunity across society and individual freedom: strive to achieve an appropriate balance between these two conflicting, fundamental American values.

When our laws and practices have created such a high degree of equality among all citizens that the zeal to initiate new ways of doing things is waning, then our nation would be out of balance on the "equal opportunity" side of the spectrum.

And when our laws and practices have created such a high degree of the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few that a high percentage of the public is becoming disengaged from the political process, because of feeling dis-empowered, then our nation would be out of balance on the "freedom" side of the spectrum - at least the freedom of the wealthy few and of the large corporations.

We must ask ourselves today then, as the election season heats up, whether we are in either imbalanced situation.  If we are, we must elect representatives and officials who will help us move back toward balance.

We will not survive as the America we say we want to be if we do not have an appropriate balance for all Americans between equal opportunity and freedom.

*

**


***

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

To My Grandfolks House We'd Go [reminiscence]

***

**

*
My father had been an orphan since he was 13 years old.  So I had only one set of grandparents, my mother's folks, who lived four or even five hours north of us in the town of Cleburne, Texas.

They sometimes visited us at our home, and even brought my great-aunt - who didn't drive - with them now and then.  But we went to their house more often than they came to us.  Altogether we probably saw them once a year or so, most often with our family doing the driving.

1

We usually went on a fairly small state road that went through Lampasas, Texas, so we thought of that as the Lampasas route.  For some reason, the children liked that way better.  My Dad, though - maybe just for some variety - sometimes directed us through the other route, passing through Waco on a U S highway. 

Whichever route we took, we very seldom stopped along the way.  But there was one real landmark on the Waco route.  The highway actually passed the city center on the East.  At the junction with the Business Route into the city, there was a roundabout, the only one I ever saw until I went to Europe many years later.  We called it "the Waco circle," as just about everyone did.  That could have been because there was a well-known restaurant there called "The Circle."  I'll bet there are even now thousands of us still vertical and compos mentis who remember that diner-type place.

Every time we passed, my Dad would share a memory of an earlier time when he had stopped there at The Circle.  It was more or less halfway between Austin, where he had worked for years at the university, and his hometown of Fort Worth, where he still had friends, including former associates at the Star-Telegram where he'd worked on and off for a number of years.

2

The only thing I can remember about the Lampasas route is that quite close to Austin was a tiny town - just a few buildings strung along the little state highway - called Coxville.  There, somewhat hidden by trees and overgrown bushes was a small, dingy, orangeish building with an old sign on it: "The Coxville Zoo."  It seemed to be open for business despite its rundown appearance.  But even my sister and I never wanted to stop for a visit.

It sure was a landmark, though, and a welcome one too when we were heading back from Cleburne, since it meant we would be home soon.

I think it was on the Waco route, or maybe on an alternate route between Waco and Cleburne, that we sometimes went by a town called Waxahatchie, known in those days for its honey, and another even littler place called Hico.

That's pronounced HIGH - koh.

But whenever he drove us by there, my Dad would holler out: "HIGH-koh, (pause), HEE-koh, (then rapidly) HIGH-koh  HEE-koh  HIGH-koh!"

We thought it was silly for him to say this, everytime we went through... but how silly is it that I remember it now, 60 years later?

3

There was one especially memorable time the four of us piled into our little sedan - a two-door black Ford from about 1947 or '48 - to go to Cleburne for Christmas.  It may have been Christmas or the day before, but there was even a little more than the usual excitement that morning as we hustled our way into our places in the car.  My parents did seem a little more breathless than we usually saw them, if I'm not imagining it.  So we set out on the Waco route.

I may have read my Classics Illustrated or one of my biographies of great Americans as children - like Patrick Henry, Boy Patriot, or Abigail Adams, a Girl of Colonial Days - while my sister looked at her insufferable Photoplay magazine. 

But as we approached the Waco circle, my mother and father had apparently had a private little conversation, with a sad result.  We drove all the way around the circle.

"Hey kids!" Dad called out as we headed now in the opposite direction: "We're going home again just for a few minutes!"

Both my parents seemed upset, an unusual situation for us, so neither I nor my stupid sister even asked why or said anything else.  Oh, maybe one of us asked if we could go to the bathroom.

The point is, as we figured it out in a moment or two more, that we realized that our secret Christmas presents - the ones Santa brings in the night - had not made it to the car that morning in all the rush. 

No, despite its adding four hours or so to our car trip, we didn't complain.

*

**

***