Genre

Monday, June 10, 2013

Illness Recollected in Tranquility, Part I

***
Note: Part II, 6/11/13; Part III, 6/13; Part IV, 6/14.


Now that I’m about 75% or so back toward normal after my recent health crisis, I realize looking back that several particularly memorable experiences stand out from the rest.

 *

The crisis began with my going to sleep (under anesthesia) for a simple outpatient procedure and waking up with two tubes down my throat, oxygen being blown up my nose, lying flat on my back of course, and finding both hands bound to the sides of my hospital bed.  Thank goodness A----- was there to explain that something had gone wrong in the “simple” procedure, and I had stopped breathing.  The tubes went down my throat into my lungs.

*

Quite a lot of solicitous people were around, looking after me when I awoke in my Intensive Care room, and the whole emergency was described to me clearly enough.  I’d already had several transfusions by then and was still receiving blood through one of my many I. V. lines.  (Altogether, I eventually got 14 pints of blood plus some plasma.)

Hovering over me during the crisis itself had been the doctor who’d done the procedure I went in for – which, I was assured, was a success – as well as my regular Cardiologist, my Physical Care Physician (I still want to say “G. P.”), my regular Pulmonologist, and a gastro-enterologist whom they’d called in when all the blood was found in my lungs.

Maybe this all sounds alarming.  What my own mind was focused on was that I could not talk, could barely make any sounds at all.  I couldn’t make gestures since my hands were tied down.  Obviously I couldn’t write.  I lay there as peacefully as I could.  Eventually it was just A----- and a nurse with me.  But I still had no way to communicate with them.  With my right hand, I was able to control the lights above the bed, the t.v. at the ceiling across the room, and the Call button if I needed something.

And this was how I remained for the better part of three days.

*

I couldn’t sleep.  I couldn’t be sedated, with the breathing problems I’d had.  I could see the clock across the room, which did seem to be moving…

On the second morning, when A----- returned, I gestured as best I could that I wanted to write something.  The very worst part of this torture was still that I could not communicate.  I thought no one realized how awful this situation was for me.  Maybe just a tiny change or two would help, at least a little; and besides, any change at all would have been something for me to think about…

A----- got the nurses to provide a marking pen and a big laminated sheet that was big enough to stretch from my one bound hand to the other, and – without being able to see what I was doing – I tried to write something like, “I am being well cared for, but this is still a pretty bad situation.  Perhaps the nurses can think of a little change here and there that might make it more comfortable, do you think?”

After I had moved my pen over the page a few seconds, A----- started trying her best to make out my words.  The process wasn’t working at all. 

After several minutes of trying and failing to be understood, I knew I had to start using large print and to simplify my message.  Simplify.  To this day, A----- remembers the one word she could make out clearly in what I wrote then: “A-g-o-n-y.”

 We abandoned the attempt for me to write.  The fifteen minutes we had spent in the effort was by far the most interesting thing I’d had to think about for the past twelve hours or so, which was some consolation.

Note: Part II, 6/11/13; Part III, 6/13; Part IV, 6/14.
***

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Why? a health story (reminiscence)



***
Here’s an account of a very recent health experience.  I'm finally on the mend now, but I had a scary and unpleasant time of it.


1
The context is that my wife and I had bought a new home in a Midwestern city, and without even listing it we'd sold our outstate New York home, with the closing set for May 2.  The moving van was scheduled to come take all our stuff away on Thursday April 26.

Packing had gone well; we had just enough time left to put away the things we'd been living with right up until the end.  Also, about three weeks before, I'd started a new, potent osteoporosis drug.   Looking back it’s clear that it wasn't just coincidental that I started having insomnia and irregular heartbeats shortly after starting the new drug.   


Finally, from all the packing dust, I had also become quite congested, wheezing, short of breath at times, and that sort of thing.


2

The heart arrhythmia wasn't debilitating, but it was a little disconcerting... especially when I confirmed that it had been caused by my response to the new drug.  So on Monday April 22 we went to consult with my cardiologist. He got me scheduled for a little procedure to realign the heart rhythm late Tuesday: cardioversion, it’s called.  I'd done it before; it takes about an hour, even including getting over the anesthesia.


However, this time it did not go simply.


I stopped breathing! but the heart was strong, so putting an oxygen tube down my throat into my lungs worked well enough to restore my breathing.  I had tubes down my mouth and nose: I. V.’s into me hanging all over two metal poles.  I had no sedation for two days this way, with my hands tied down so that I wouldn't unconsciously mess with the tubes.


Of course, I couldn't talk.  Couldn't move.  Frankly, I don't know how I got through it. On the third day, the radiologist had a look into my stomach through a catheter in my groin. Since he couldn't find evidence of fresh bleeding in my stomach, the pulmonologist was authorized to decide whether or not to pull out the breathing tube. What a blessing it was to be able to talk and move my upper body again.


On the other hand, I was still immobilized for five hours more so that the catheterization could heal up. I knew I had a lot of self-discipline, but lordy, it was put to the test in those long days.


3


I still was getting my only nourishment via I.V.  I could talk and read and control the tv.  Finally although I still was receiving oxygen - not to mention lots of meds by I.V. - I could get up enough to sit in the chair beside my bed. That was surprisingly delicious.


Eventually the I. V.'s dwindled enough that I could use a walker and shuffle around the I C U. I might wake up at 3 a.m. and announce I wanted to go for a walk, and two staff (at first) would accompany me pushing the I. V. poles beside me. This movement sped my recovery quite a bit.


4


I was making good progress until the stomach specialist had a look down my throat into the stomach and discovered I still had a lot of fluid there - including blood - so a new tube was installed (through my nose this time) to drain it away. That was a little set-back, but a day later that was finished so I went back to getting better.


By Friday morning, May 3, the day after the rescheduled moving van in fact cleaned out our NYS home, the doctors said I was stable enough to be transferred to the hospital in the Midwest.   My wife and I were carried to the airport in an ambulance, where we were placed in a small medical jet and flown to our new home city.


5


Three hours after lift-off, another ambulance took us to the new hospital... not to ICU but to a regular room. I was getting oxygen and was limited to eating (drinking) clear fluids. I could sit in a chair but could not move around other than that.


After a couple of days, though, I was issued a walker and taught how to release myself from the oxygen feed, so I was back on the move again. Everything was pretty stable, but I could not be weaned off the oxygen altogether. Finally on the third day I achieved that milestone. On Tuesday, May 7, I was released and joined my wife in our new home.


 6


Since then – a week ago - I have continued to get stronger. I have three home care providers coming to visit twice a week: a nurse, a physical therapist, and an occupational therapist. Tomorrow (May 15) I will meet the man who will probably become my new heart guy, and on May 28 I will be linked up with a new Personal Care Physician. After that point I will probably be left to continue to recover on my own.


Why did all this happen to me?  How did I get through it?


Some questions just cannot be answered, I guess.

***

Monday, April 22, 2013

Davy Crockett in Paris (Reminiscence)

***

A small thing.

In the 1960s - perhaps having begun in the late 1950s - one of the most watched American t. v. shows was "The Adventures of Davy Crockett" starring the Texan Fess Parker.  My Dad, who followed the theatrical careers of a considerable number of UT graduates who went on to fame and fortune in acting (from such as Walter Cronkite and Eli Wallach to such as Do-Do McQueen or "L. Q. Jones" and Katherine Grandstaff or "Kathy Grant") had at least a vague recollection of Fess Parker's career on the University of Texas stage.

(He has subsequently made a name for himself as a wine-maker, I understand.)

The t.v. show was so popular, for so long, it must have been inevitable it would eventually be the basis of a full-length feature film in movie houses.

*

In 1962 I was caught up - not to say overwhelmed - in mastering the French language well enough so that I could take full advantage of spending an academic year in Paris.

As much as anything I was learning from bits of conversation I heard "on the streets" and from old movies.  So I came to know that there was a French equivalent for the way Americans used the word "ass."  Not the animal, you know, but a rather impolite way to refer to one's bottom, backside, derriere, posterior.

And, like the American word, the French one also had enough emotional power that it could be used for rhetorical impact: very much as we might have said something like "'Brilliant cinematic art' my ass!" about some pretentious new movie.  "'Billiant' ma fesse," one could say in French with the same level of rudeness, perhaps slapping one's backside to emphasize the point.

*

So I guess it should not have suprised and amused me late in the 1961-62 academic year to see on the marquee on the Champs-Elysees film theater that specialized in bringing the latest American film epics to the starving French public, boasting about "Now Showing" the much-anticipated "The Adventures of Davy Crockett, starring Frank Parker."

And one has to admit that it just wouldn't do to have said this popular box-office smash starred someone called Ass Parker, now would it?

***

Thursday, April 4, 2013

"The Deadly Sins": What Can We Learn From Them? (essay)

***

The Seven Deadly Sins: remember that? Following my custom of starting a thought process by discussing first the broad foundational concepts involved and then wondering about their application to us today, I thought I'd scan these familiar "sins" a moment or two: what do you think? (...Not that these, essential Roman Catholic principles ever seemed really important to me personally, you understand...)

1

The seven possible, "deadly" human traits are these:

1. Sloth

This feature of the individual is more extreme and more permanent than simple inactivity or laziness. A truly slothful person is incapacited by his or her nature, prevented from action. Sloth is one sin I find it hard to imagine, frankly. I wonder if it has any relation to Despair...? (We might say "depression")


2. Envy

"I wish I could be as good-looking as he is," or "Why couldn't it have been me who won the lottery?" or " He didn't deserve that promotion as much as I do." Most of us have passing thoughts like this from time to time; it's only human nature. The deadly sin of Envy, on the other hand, is a permanent disposition to resent the good fortune, of any kind, of anyone else. Jealousy, the green-eyed montster, is also not Envy; instead of directing one's ill-will at the person enjoying the benefit you are not experiencing yourself, Jealousy at least primarily directs the ill-will at the individual - a loved one, presumably - providing the other person's pleasure. (Jealousy is related to a sense of betrayal and to one's lack of control over one's beloved. Envy, on the other hand, is an ineradicable sense that one's superiority to others is not recognized or rewarded.)

Envy is an expression of one's self, stimulated by a permanent sense of injustice. It prevents contentedness or good will towards any other.

3. Gluttony

This human trait is not merely feeling intense hunger even if it happens all day long, and is not eating too much, even if the overindulgence is often repeated. It is not the simple desire of more of some food you are enjoying. It is a driving force in the individual's whole life. Gluttony is insatiable and does not even provide pleasure, which is why gluttons are portrayed as demanding more and more spices and complicated preparations of their food.

A Glutton neither enjoys vicarious pleasure at seeing someone else taking pleasure from eating, nor can she or he share his delicacies with anyone else.

4. Greed

This is not a momentary desire for more of something. It's a lasting or even permanent feature of the sinner's character, which makes it impossible for her or him to ever be satisfied, no matter how much she or he has already. Such a person of course could never feel generous or benevolent toward someone else.

5. Lust

This is an all-encompassing craving of sexual passion and pleasure. It is easily distinguished from both the simple, passing desire for sexual gratification (from anyone) and from love, since the lustful person has no regard for anyone but himself or herself.

6. Wrath

This is apparently not just anger, which is not in itself a sin; but anger in the extreme, a lasting and passionate rage; this emotion is so great and of such a nature that the wrathful individual is incapable of happiness, or love. The wrathful person is always outraged; when one provocation disappears, another is found simultaneously.  For in point of fact, the angry passion comes from within.

7. Pride

If the best human trait is Love, Pride may be the worst - or the "deadliest" - of the sins. We're not talking here about the kind of self-satisfaction that naturally follows a particular accomplishment; or simple self-esteem, or personal vanity even if that is a permanent trait. Pride in this sense involves one's always feeling that one is better than someone - anyone - else, not in looks or possessions or accomplishments, but in one's very nature. Morally, constitutionally, existentially superior.

In ordinary experience, we often propose that someone who behaves in a haughty manner, scornfully, or with apparent arrogance is actually "over-compensating" for secret or unperceived fears of inadequacy. I wonder if that folk wisdom is relevant in this discussion of the sin of Pride...?

2


One observation we should make is that these seven deadly sins are not actions or kinds of action. They are traits of one's character, elements of one's nature; constituents of one's soul (do we know what that is?). These sins are not overt behaviors but spiritual qualities. Lust is not sex without marriage or with someone else's spouse. Wrath is not punching someone in the nose or beating a hated rival to death. Gluttony is not eating a third banana split.

If not actions in themselves, are the deadly sins emotions that motivate immoral actions or that impel one to criminal, inhumane, or anti-social behavior? Well, while they may be related to each other in our experience, emotions - so close to the senses and even the muscles - are considered distinct from spiritual qualities. So, no, we should not think of them as emotions.

But it is significant, I expect, that the worst elements of human nature in the Christian world are not actions but spiritual qualities. Is this related to the mind-body duality in the western world?

3

After all, it wasn't a foregone conclusion that (a) these basic elements would be negative - not exhortations to do or be something good but prohibition of forbidden character traits - and (b) not forbidden actions but unacceptable spiritual qualities. Not all formative religious dogma are phrased this way.

Here are the "Ten Commandments" from Judaism, for instance, paraphrased somewhat freely:

1-2. Treat no other gods as more important than me,
and bow down to no pictures or statues of other gods.


3. Don't claim that our god backs or values something "he" doesn't.

4. Worship our one god every seventh day.

5. Honor your parents.

6 - 8. Don't kill
or commit adultery
or steal.

9 - 10. Don't testify falsely against another of us ("us" being those who worship this one god),
and don't wish for yourself anything that belongs to someone else among us.

These basic religious principles, unlike the deadly sins, are not traits of character but actions; however, like the seven sins, the Judaic principles are also phrased negatively: they tell us what NOT to do instead of what we should (or must) DO.

4

The "Five Pillars of Islam" - on the other hand - are all actions, and are all actions we should do instead of avoiding doing them. In addition, we might observe that they seem primarily related to rituals rather than to life:

1. Declare your faith in Islam, not in any other religion.

2. Pray in certain ways at certain times.

3. Provide money to help the poor (I wonder why this one differs from the others in the sense that it
does relate to life in the world...).

4. Deny yourself certain pleasures of food and drink.

5. Make a long, hard journey to the holiest of places.


The Christian sins disparage character traits that isolate the individual from others, while the Jewish and Islamic basic principles include an emphasis on how distinctive from others in the world around them each group is.

And in Islam, making oneself suffer seems to be a positive goal. (Does doing so create the illusion that suffering is not entirely out of control, or even bad - as it seems?)


4

The formative principles of both Buddhuism and Hinduism seem designed to help their followers reach a certain kind of "happiness," rather than to avoid going to hell after death, or in order to avoid the wrath of god, or in order to be a welcome member of one's group.

For Buddhists (as I understand it), the eight steps or stages on the path to happiness, which is the cessation of suffering, are these (enormously paraphrased):

1. View reality clearly, not seeing appearances only.
2. Hope and seek to do no harm to others and to be free and unselfish rather than greedy.
3. Speak truthfully and not hurtfully.
4. Avoid harming others.
5. Pursue a livelihood that does no harm.
6. Strive to improve.
7. Perceive yourself honestly and accurately.
8. Meditate in order to concentrate the mind on your enduring inner self within the wider reality.

Compared to not killing somebody or being free of inordinate desire of food seems kind of "easy" compared to these eight Buddhist ideals, don't they? They are things to "do" rather than "not-do," though these are primarily spiritual "actions."

Hinduism (I believe) is also primarily aimed at reaching a high level of spiritual insight, and doing so for the Hindu seems beyond ordinary effort.

5

How really significant does any or all of this - critically important in much human history - seem to us today?

We might agree that it is wrong - or even "sinful" - to be greedy, as the Super-Rich certainly seem to be in our time. We might agree that no one should steal someone else's property and even that we all should show respect for our parents, perhaps even to all our elders. Some of us might feel it is vital to be an active part of a religious community, regularly following their rituals, and we might all understand that finding, not an escape from suffering, but a status in which one sees suffering as unreal or insignificant is a valuable goal...

Any of that may happen, but... it equally may not, and I dare say that most of us wouldn't particularly notice. If the Jews and the Muslims did not think the most significant thing about a person is whether or not she or he is part of their particular group or tradition, the whole world might actually be better off, right?  (Maybe they could work toward becoming Buddhists, seeking to do no harm and to avoid speaking hurtfully of others...)

Do these foundational principles of the world's great religions seem to provide as much guidance to us in life as - say - our Declaration of Independence, that says all people are equal in their right to live, to act freely (and responsibly too), and to seek their worldly well-being?

...Or the Preamble of our Constitution, that says our government - which in a democracy is "we the people" ourselves - should ...

1. Provide for the nation’s defense  
2. Keep peace within the nation
3. Maintain a just system of laws and government
4. Promote the people's general wellbeing, and
5. Guarantee freedom to ourselves and our descendants.

How useful are the foundational teachings of the world's great religions compared to these foundational documents in American history?

6

Especially since utility may itself not be the fundamental aim of religious principles - so much as helping the individual achieve a certain spiritual state beyond social order and justice and beneficial personal behavior - maybe we should take a different perspective.

Do the negative spiritual states named as the seven deadly sins tend to prevent the individual from exercising the moral values expressed in the Declaration and the Preamble? 

Well, Sloth tends to prevent any action at all, moral or immoral; so, yes, one could say that Sloth tends to impede one from following the principles in our foundational documents.

A sinner possessed by Envy cannot feel any satisfaction from the prosperity of anyone besides herself (or himself); so, Envy does tend to prevent the sinner from valuing all others' equal rights to "the pursuit of happiness," for example.  Again, basic American values are threatened by this "deadly" sin.

A Glutton would be pretty indifferent to any of our basic principles, since her or his desire to eat is the only matter of concern... On the other hand, such an all-encompassing passion to consume seems likely to come into conflict with our moral and political obligation to promote others' general well-being and not merely one's own.  Preoccupation with eating in fact for the Glutton would seem to overcome any responsibility to others at all...

Greed would be similar to Gluttony in that only the preoccupation with having money matters to the Greedy.   Whether or not other's have an equal opportunity to make money would either be a matter of not concern or a direct threat to one's own opportunity.

Lust is also similar; sexual gratification is all that matters. Defending the nation and - well, maintaining justice, for instance - couldn't be of any importance to the Lustful.

The Wrathful would seem an active threat to our efforts to keep the peace or maintain a system of laws and justice.

Pride is a direct challenge to the most fundamental principle of all that everyone is politically (and morally) equal to everyone else.  The Proud believes no such thing, since he or she is superior to everyone else.

7

So at least we could say that identifying, criticising, and fighting the seven deadly sins would not do harm to our nation's professed values, and in some cases may even do some good.  Identifying a greedy corporation or CEO or financier as a "sinner" of the worst sort may help us get together on how to restrain such individuals.  Naming a racist or sexist or plutocrat - a Proud person who feels superior to others - as someone who should be shunned by those of us who try to be virtuous could do some good socially and politically.  And so on.

The test of whether or not such formative principles support or threaten our public values - peace and prosperity, equal opportunity, freedom and justice for all - is what should matter the most when we are thinking of not only ourselves and our own spiritual state (significant as that may be) but the good of all humankind.

***

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Slogans Can Save Your Life! (Reminiscence)

***


1

One time I took a new job halfway across the country. After I arrived, I discovered no one had told me - apparently because no one knew - how little preparation had been made for the first key, four-month project we would undertake, for which I was primarily responsible. In fact, I didn't discover this myself until the morning of the first day I reported for work, when the project began.

To say I felt overwhelmed would be an understatement. I had no time or opportunity to go to my colleagues and seek their aid, especially their solutions to the problems that had suddenly become urgent... (After all, they had gotten us into this problem to begin with.) I did tell my boss. I didn't expect any advice from him since this was not his field but mine, but I did need his support.

I scambled around to do what had to be done that very morning myself. It should have been a task for a team of two or three, but I cobbled something together, based on past experience working with others in similar situations. Then I had a moment or two to investigate how similar projects at my new place had been managed in the past. There was one key clue there, a part-time temporary employee who had filled in to cover a couple of the gaps.

My boss was surprised this young woman had not been lined up before opening day, and he also put in a good word or two for her good sense and abilities. Thank goodness I reached her immediately by phone. She could report for duty tomorrow morning.

That adequately addressed about half of the project-long difficulties that had become evident about 8:30 a.m. As for the other half, as I broke it to my wife at dinner that night, for the first four months I was going to have to put in some more hours than we had planned. I had been able to move one of the full-timers with an apparently lighter load than anyone else into another gap by assuring him that I would personally take over one of his lesser assignments (in addition to my own routine duties).

What a first day that was! And the work got done, at least as well as it had the last time before they brought me in. That didn't seem good enough, but at least we had avoided lasting damage.

2

This was my first supervisory or leadership position. I'd been looking forward to the new opportunity to make a difference for the better not only in my own work but in the work of a whole group of people. That first day had been an unexpected challenge, and it was troubling too, revealing how more fundamental work than expected would have to be done to get our little team running efficiently and effectively.

Just about every day in that first week or two, I discovered more such basic work that needed to be done. My feeling of being overhelmed didn't lessen, although now, at least the urgency had eased somewhat.

Every morning as I considered all the separate projects that seemed to need doing, I found myself saying to myself, "First things first." Prioritizing seemed not just a key to a good job; it seemed like the only way I could survive. One of the first things to do, I thought, was to lay the groundwork for avoiding repetitions of the crisis of my first day. That involved every member of my group, and it involved the group as a whole too. Where to begin? (Or which "thing" should come "first"?)

In other words, in order to cheer myself on, just about every day I kept reminding myself I didn't need to do in that one day all that should be done eventually (not to mention that I couldn't do it!). Instead, "First things first." That became kind of a slogan.

3

Facing tough challenges was fun, I have to say, and I was actually enjoying myself even when what I had to do was mainly putting out fires and solving crises. In between, I seemed to be actually getting some of the longer-range work done too.

But eventually, I got tired.

Working at top speed 12 or 14 hours a day, even if it was kind of a rush... was exhausting. It could not last.

Also, here my wife and I were living in a new town, with much to explore - right down to which was the nearest tolerable supermarket - and my poor wife was having to face all of it all by herself. She was getting tired too, and besides, she was getting sick of it.

As I tried to find ways to cut back a little, it began to dawn on me that everything that needed doing at work just could not be done in my first five or six months. I shouldn't let myself feel overwhelmed every day, even as I reminded myself to do "First Things First." I had to realize that enough was enough.

Wait a minute, I thought. I should not have one slogan, but two: "First Things First" should be complemented by "Enough Is Enough." They were a pair, like bookends.

4

Those two slogans helped me get through not months, but years of challenging, interesting work, despite continuing surprises and temporary crises. When faced with a volume of challenges I just could not overcome in the foreseeable future, I would begin by reminding myself: "First things first." Then, tired at the end of the day, frustrated at what I didn't get to, I reminded myself of slogan two: "Enough is enough." That did not mean I was fed up or I was giving in. It meant that what I had been able to accomplish was enough, not just enough for one day, but enough to go on just fine. Enough!

But, over time, it began to dawn on me that I also needed a deeper challenge. It was not okay to be satisfied with just making progress, especially when it was merely progress climbing slowly out of a deep hole. It wasn't enough to settle for mediocrity.

Like everybody else, in my little departrment and in our organization as a whole, we should all be aiming higher than that... We should hope, expect, and plan to get better.

...Which led to the third slogan: "Good enough is not good enough."


***

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Idealism, Dogmatism and Other Action-Blockers

****

1
We've been hearing a lot these days about a whole variety of public issues that need action to address them. "Obstructionists," "the party of No," "dysfunctional government": these are only three of the many catch phrases recently invented to provoke outrage at the apparent inability or unwillingness of our elected representatives to take the relevant actions we need.

What we would seem to need is a government consisting of Pragmatists, those who understand what Count Bismarck apparently said, that "Politics is the art of the possible." A pure pragmatist - if we can conceive of such an individual - has no values, no goals, no ideals... other than the goal of avoiding elements preventing action.  We need more Pragmatists in government.

We can see right away, I think, that a Pragmatist differs significantly from an Idealist, who is focused on determining and pursuing the best (or even "the best possible," allowing for a certain amount of realism in order to avoid what we call mere "pie in the sky") but with little or no concern about how to achieve this ideal. Pragmatists - in their pursuit of action - must be in touch with reality; they must be Realists. Idealists, on the other hand, often seem to be pursuing an unrealistic end: nothing short of perfection. Is Pragmatism, then, the very opposite of Idealism?

We'll return to this question a bit later.
2

Between two conceptual opposites are varying degrees of each contrasting quality along a spectrum, such as the gradations between black and white, between altruism and selfishness, and between time of birth and time of death.

Such a spectrum has one extreme of the first quality at one end and the other extreme quality at the other end.  Midway between (of course) is the spot at which the two qualities exist in exactly equal proportions.

Such as -

                        Blue..................................Green.................................Yellow

or


  Too Hot.......................Just Right...........................Too Cold

or

                        Slavery..............................?....................................Freedom

or

                        Hedonism.........................?......................................Stoicism

or

 Starting Line............The Halfway Mark...............Finish Line

 3

In some cases, we have no word to identify the point on the spectrum where the two opposites are in equal balance, only words to mark points just shy of or just beyond the mid-point.

Such as:

                       Pleased.............Satisfied...............Dissatisfied............Angry

or

                       Here..................Close........................Far.....................There


or

Pleasure............Comfort.................Discomfort..............Pain


4


It is sometimes useful to consider two different spectrums laid out at 90o to each other. In this type of figure, a circle can be drawn around the ends of the spectrums, with the center of this circle being the balance point on each spectrum.   Midway on the one spectrum is exactly midway on the perpendicular spectrum, at the center of the circle thus created.

Imagine, for example, a figure with two spectrums crossing at 90o to each other, such as this one, representing (1) Responsible to Innocent, crossing with (2) Free to Enslaved:






The midpoint (M-1) between Responsible on the first spectrum and Free on the second spectrum lies on the circumference of the circle.  There are three other such midpoints (M-2, M-3, M-4) in the additional three "new" spectrums created in this circular structure.  The same distance from the midpoint to each end of the spectrum is the same in all six continuums:  Free vs Enslaved, Free vs Innocent, Innocent vs Enslaved, and Enslaved vs Responsible.  One would expect to find spectrums crossing the diagram diagonally:  (1) from M-2 midway between Free and Responsible to M-3 midway between Enslaved and Innocent, and (2) from midway M-2 between Innocent and Free to M-4 midway between Responsible and Enslaved.

And this is interesting to contemplate, isn't it? Freedom and Responsibility are indeed related in this way: A person "with a moral conscience," as it used to be common to say, is not absolutely free but constrained by his or her sense of responsibility toward others: i.e. at M-1.  Also, it is an accepted legal principle that a person who is forced to commit a crime is not responsible legally for that crime. Such a person would be positioned at the midpoint (M-3) between Innocence and Bondage (or "enslavement").  This would lie across the circle from M-1.   Such a person would have done something regrettable but would have been forced to do it.

And at the same time, an individual who is free can be (and should be) responsible for how her or his action affect others.  Such an ideal individual we might think of as equally free and responsible.  So, freedom and responsibility are not at opposite extremes of the same single spectrum; they can co-exist in one person.  An individual who is both free and responsible (at M-1), on the other hand, is at the opposite end of a spectrum between an individual (at M-3) who is both responsible ("not innocent") and enslaved ("not free") such as a person who has committed a murder but was forced by another to do it.

Thoughtfully constructing a diagram like this one can therefore lead to insights about the concepts under consideration themselves.

5

To return, then, to our question whether Idealism and Pragmatism are exact opposites:

Though the two do contrast, I'd say they are not exact opposites that we could correctly position at opposite ends of a spectrum like those we have been imagining.  The Pragmatist is devoted to action, to what is practical, realistic to do.  The Pragmatist, that is, is not entirely without values, what we might call "ideals"; even the pure Pragmatist is limited to only one ideal, but ideal it is.  So, pragmatism is not the exact opposite of Idealism even though the two concepts do contrast significantly.

So, what is the opposite of Pragmatism, and what is the opposite of Idealism?

6 
Let's start with Pragmatism: what is its exact opposite?
The central feature of the extreme Pragmatist (or, as I would prefer to say, the pure Pragmatist) is her or his desire to get things done, to deal with the practical details of doing something.  The "less pure" Pragmatist might say her or his central preoccupation is "to move ahead" or "to make progress."  Moving toward what? or What is progress rather than regression? might be the questions of an Idealistic Pragmatist.  To the pure Pragmatist, on the other hand, it is the "moving" part that matters most: Let's get going! she might say.

So, what is it that most directly opposes change?  Opposition to change is as contrary to Pragmatism as anything could be.

If everything is already clear, settled, fixed, - well - change would not only be unnecessary: it would be downright bad.  The exact opposite of Pragmatism, then, is Dogmatism! 

And also: we will have to acknowledge from our own experience, I believe, that nothing prevents progress - or possibly even change of any kind - more surely than a person who believes that he or she knows - the Dogmatist often says, "all of us" know - what's right or true or even ideal, so trying out something new and different, non-traditional, and especially contradictory to preconceived convictions... is just plain wrong. 

The Dogmatist would say the Idealist should stop striving for an ideal not revealed in Dogma, and the Pragmatist should stop taking actions toward someone's "ideals."  On the other hand, the Pragmatist frequently finds himself or herself fighting precisely such obstacles to action as preconceived attitudes, values, taboos, and beliefs that emerge from tradition rather than experience.
So, we can imagine a spectrum with Pragmatism at one extreme and Dogmatism at the other end:

                               Pragmatism..........(M)..........Dogmatism.

Nothing blocks action more effectively than Dogma - whether it is the dogmatic opposition to more taxes or to same-sex marriage, opposition to trust in even the most democratic and balanced of governments, or opposition to war or to capital punishment.
 5

By the way, we have seen that Idealism is significantly different from Pragmatism, since the pure Idealist does not consider how the ideal can be achieved, pondering only what the ideal is.  But we have also imagined a Pragmatist trying to find ways to make progress toward something better, an individual whom we called an "Idealistic Pragmatist."  Such an individual is mostly pragmatic, but also cares about the purpose of the action she or he is facilitating.

Likewise, we might imagine someone similar who cares about taking action moving us toward some goal but who cares less about how such "progress" will be made.  "Just get it done" might be the attitude of such a Pragmatic Idealist.

But what is the relationship between Idealism and Dogmatism?  Are dogmas the same as ideals ("dogmas" just being a pejorative term for "ideals")?

No.  Far from opposing change, the Idealist - who recognizes that perfection is never fully achieved - is always seeking change.  On the other hand, a key feature of dogmatism is resistance to change:  we already know the one real truth, the dogmatist seems to say, so why pursue change which can only make things worse!

Although in this important respect the dogmatist is significantly different from the Idealist, neither is primarily committed to figuring out how to take action.  On the other hand, the Idealist is glad to have the ideal actually pursued, and we could imagine someone as a Pragmatic Idealist.

But we could not imagine a Dogmatic Pragmatist; the concept is self-contradictory.  But we do recognize that an Idealist may be wholly committed to her or his ideas supported not by experience or by actions taken (as in the trial and error method that most pragmatists use), but by tradition, preconceived ideas, or faith alone.  Such an individual might be thought of as a Dogmatic Idealist.

6

If Idealism is neither the same thing nor the exact opposite of Dogmatism, what is Idealism's opposite.

What is most important for an Idealist, of course, is perfection of one sort or another or in one area or another.  What if an individual does not believe that achieving perfection is possible and therefore is not worth pursuing?  In fact, such an individual might think ideals themselves are not even worth thinking about.  Such a person, we might want to say, is Cynical.

I think, then, we can conceive another spectrum transecting that contrasting Pragmatism and Dogmatism; this one has at one end Idealism and at the other end its opposite Cynicism.

                      Idealism.......................(M).....................Cynicism.

The four ends of the two spectrums at right angles to each other would look therefore like this:



7

So what's the difference between a Pragmatic Idealist and an Idealistic Pragmatist?

...And should we care?

To the latter question: Probably not, unless it may affect how we vote in one election or another.  As to the first question: a Pragmatic Idealist cares about taking real, concrete actions toward her or his ideals but cares even more about learning and educating about what the ideal (in a particular issue) is.  An Idealistic Pragmatist, on the other hand, has less interest in the details of Idealists' discussions about what the ideals are, and is more impatient to get on with the effort to make progress in that direction.

But that's a subtle distinction, and it's often difficult to determine in real life.  But just think how great it would be to have to decide which of these two - either the Pragmatic Idealist or the Idealistic Pragmatist - should lead us at any particular time!  Both Pragmatic Idealists and Idealistic Pragmatists care about long-range goals and basic values, and both recognize the importance of making progress in the right direction sooner rather later.  Half a loaf is indeed better than none... but only if you get the right half!


8

And a final two questions are likewise relatively unimportant in the bigger picture:  What is the difference between a Dogmatic Idealist and an Idealistic Dogmatist? and does it matter?

A person who values preconceived ideals and values above all else, but cares (secondarily) that the the preconceptions are unquestionably true would be an Idealistic Dogmatist.  And a person who thinks what is of primary importance is to understand and to convince others that her or his ideals are true, but who also feels (secondarily) that those ideals are already well-known to "us all" would be a Dogmatic Idealist.  But does such a subtle distinction matter?

No.  It doesn't really matter; both are bad... 


At least they are bad for our country today, when as a nation we can't get anything done because we lack enough leaders who could be placed on our chart somewhere between Idealism and Pragmatism. 






****

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Wise Sayings 14 from Ron Lucius

Wise Sayings 14 from Ron Lucius
*
*
 
Them thats has, gets.
Them as slows us down, lose.
We who trail behind, may move ahead.
We who have, give.
……………………………………………………………………Ron Lucius
 
 
*
Free capitalisms rule, socialisms lag behind.
Republics are profitable, Democracies are dysfunctional.
Democratic republics work well.
Well-managed capitalisms serve all of us best.
……………………………………………………………………Ron Lucius
 
 
*


Pythagoras left us his elegant and useful theorem: A2+B2=C2
 
He also wrote, "Do not eat beans."
……………………………………………………………………Ron Lucius


*

Gravity can kill you.
……………………………………………………………………Ron Lucius



*

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Septicemic? (Reminiscence)

*

What Does 'Septicemic' Mean?

1

In those days, my Associate used to check in with me about 8:15 every morning.  Maratha and my secretary Ronni would chat for a few minutes.  We'd mention whatever needed mentioning to each other, and then go on with our days.  Maratha knew she could just come into my inner office whenever she was motivated to do so, unless Ronni told her I was meeting with someone else... And she did.  She came right in when she needed direction, consultation, or approval.  We would discuss whatever was on her mind, and then she'd go away again.

As to approval, after we'd been working together long enough for us to know how the other approached matters or how one kind of issue was likely to work out, Maratha would sometimes walk in and say, "Just say Yes (or No) to this..." before telling me what I was going to approve or deny.  It worked great.

The point is, we communicated a lot, as needed, at the moment.

But as if that were not enough, we also set aside a regular two hours every week - Wednesday mornings from ten to noon (if we needed that long) - so that we could be sure not to lose track of long-term projects or issues we were watching or other matters that might have been important but not urgent like everything else.

2

One summer Wednesday morning, Maratha had said in the chit-chat session first thing that day that she didn't feel quite right and worried that she might have been coming down with something.

When she showed up again at ten for our weekly meeting, I naturally asked how she was getting along.  She said Not good, adding that a friend with whom she'd spent some time over the last weekend had come down with some kind of flu.  I told her she should go home, but she said she would but only after we'd had our meeting.

As we sat there in my office, slogging through several matters, Maratha was her usual strictly-business self, except she just couldn't seem to sit still.  She said the joints in her legs felt sore even though she hadn't been working out.  But we kept plugging along until we'd finished our business a little before noon.  I reminded her she ought to go home and take care of herself.

She said she'd clear up some things and get the staff organized to cover for her, and would then be off for the rest of the day.

3

I went home for lunch.  Our children were away with friends or family, so it was just the two of us, my wife and me.  Naturally I told Ashlie about Maratha's discomfort.  We had our sandwiches with fruit for dessert, and I lay down for a few minutes, as I often did.

This was summer, remember.  But after dozing a few minutes, I rummaged through a drawer so I could throw a blanket over me.  I mentioned to Ashlie that I was chilled, and turned the fan at the window so that it didn't blow right at me on the bed.

We talked about my staying in nap-mode for an extra half-hour (fortunately I didn't have anything specific scheduled at 1 o'clock)... By this point I was shivering.  Ashlie brought me a second blanket, and we talked about my apparently coming down with that damn flu that Maratha must have passed along to me.  In another half-hour or so, Ashlie called to tell Ronni I was out of commission for the day.  We were hoping it was one of those "overnight" things and I would be back at work Thursday morning.

Pretty soon, I was sleeping fitfully.  Ashlie felt my forehead, and in-between dozes, took my temperature.  I don't remember the numbers, but they were high enough for Ashlie to call my internist to see what time she could drag me over to see him.

4

No, the doctor wouldn't be in until Thursday morning.  I could come in then for a quick consult.  There was a virus going 'round...

After another half-hour of the sweats and then more chills, Ashlie called my doctor's service again to find out who would be able to see me right away.  That's how we found out - didn't everybody know? - in our town all the doctors (many lawyers too, we eventually learned) everyone took summer Wednesday afternoons off... to play golf, was what we were told.

How about the Emergency Room? my wife asked.  Would her husband be waiting two or three hours on those uncomfortable chairs (without my blankets or other home equipment) until someone could tell him he was sick and should go home and stay in bed?  Yes, probably, we were told.  (By the way, Walk-in Clinics didn't exist then, at least not in our town.)

5

So, toughing it out on our own at home seemed the only option.  Ashlie gave me some all-purpose pain pills, and I dozed off again.  The plan was for me to have a hot bath every so often.  That might help me feel a little better too.  I was hoping Maratha wasn't suffering through the same symptoms.  She was single...   Should we ask Ronni to call?  (I can't remember if we did...)

When I awoke after one of my longer naps, hot and sweaty, I hauled myself up to go to the bathroom... Which I did, but wondering just how bad I looked, I peered over at the mirror above the vanity.

Yikes!  I almost jumped out of my skin.  I called Ashlie to come have a look.

The lower right side of my face was hugely swollen, as though I'd had a tooth extracted a couple of hours before.  But there was no pain, in my tooth or anywhere else. ...And of course, I had not in fact had anything extracted.

6

Well, surprising as it may seem, this was good news.  And Ashlie knew just what to do. 

As I dragged myself back to bed, Ashlie got on the 'phone again, this time to Dr. Kraus's office; he was the oral surgeon who'd extracted our children's wisdom teeth.  He was finishing up his last appointment at his firm's office in Rock Hill, a small town about 45 minutes south.  We'd have to get through the night on our own, taking a few precautions the office prescribed for me.  But I had a firm appointment in the Corning office at 7:30 a.m.  The oral surgeon - "Hal" to us - and his assistant would come in early before their first regularly scheduled patient. 

And the nice little town of Ronan was only 15 minutes to the west, too.


7

We were on our way west before anyone else was on the way to work.  The streets and roads were almost empty, even though at that time of year it was already broad daylight.

Not that either of us felt like celebrating the nice weather.  Far from it.  Ashlie was haggard from a night of little sleep  Her lips were drawn tight with the strain.  And I must have looked like a zombie with a toothache - a pale grey-blue, unshaven monster, with the left side of my jaw bulging out an inch or two.

I tried not to lean too heavily on Ashlie as she helped me shuffle across the parking lot and up to the office door.  When we got inside and the assistant came out, we heard her little sharp intake of breath - in other words, her little gasp.  That isn't good, we were thinking.

"Dr. Hal" joined us immediately.  There was a minimum of chit-chat.  We could bring him up-to-date on our children later.  The two of them hustled about while Ashlie hovered behind, trying to stay out of their way.  Driving in, she'd taken some comfort in noticing that Dr. Kraus's office was next door to the Rock Hill Hospital.

8

My blood pressure was 60 over 40.  120 over 80 is "normal," as we knew, and I was usually close to that mark.  I now know that 40 over 20 is often fatal... So I was closer to dead than to my norm.  And I was still conscious too.

The doctor told me I had an abscess in a lower molar, explaining that indicated that quite a lot of bacterial infection had grown up around a deteriorating root.  He gave me a shot of a fairly potent broad-spectrum antibiotic - "Kafir" I think it was called - saying he would call in a prescription for a small number of tablets for me to be taking for the next 24 or 36 hours.  He stuck another needle into my gum in the lower left side of my mouth.  He must have numbed that part of my mouth beforehand, because I don't remember any prick or pain from that second needle.

I do remember, though, the white puss that spurted out.  Yuck.  Dr. Kraus seemed to have been expecting the little splash.  Ashlie remained calm. 

The doctor filled up his syringe with more puss which he said he'd send to the lab in the hospital next door.  By tomorrow afternoon - oh, yes, I was slowly realizing:  there were two work days left that week - by then, Dr. Kraus would call Ashlie to say she could go over to the drug store to pick up a more focused antibiotic for me to take.  He said I was "septicemic" and was to take every pill in the new prescription.

The crisis was over.  A trained professional was taking care of me.  I had a firm diagnosis and was started on a treatment.  And I hadn't died.

9

It was astounding how long it took to recover.  I feel sure I did take the rest of the week off, even though after only a day or so of antibiotics I was feeling much better.  But I did tire easily for many weeks thereafter.  Shortly, I was going into the office for a few hours, half a day perhaps, and then returning home for a nap... or more.  The weather was pleasant outside and sunny.  I used to sit on the back porch and bask like a snake in the sun.

I remember now that it was during this period of sunlit afternoons soaking up the vitamin D in the sunshine when I read a biography of Dizzy Dean.   The author happened to mention - in passing - that one "off day" late in the 1930s "Ol' Diz" had played with the Cardinals an exhibition game against the Reds in the grand old ball park in the city where we lived (as we do now).  I must have read quite a bit in this slow recuperative period, but I remember that.

10

I took on as much work as I could, though, despite my family's anxieties.  One weekend about six weeks or so after that terrible Wednesday, a two-day out-of-town retreat had been scheduled for a long time, one of whose primary purposes was for me to report on a contentious, complex long-term project I had been leading for several years.  There were also a lot of team-building activities planned, so that we could all be sure to be on the same page.  A rather well-known organizational psychologist had been contracted, and all of us had done a fair amount of preparatory work to get ready...

I didn't think I could just not go, despite the expectation that the two (and a half) days would be frenetic, maybe stressful, and l-o-n-g...

So, I tagged along, with the assurance from the President that no one would be shocked if I wandered away now and then to lie down for a while. 

The first day took place in a conference center in a remodeled grand old, historic mansion up on an isolated hilltop.  There was nowhere special for me to go, I discovered, so I remember cozying up for several quiet naps on the floor of the little copy room upstairs off the hall among the former bedrooms, now made into conference rooms for "break-out" sessions.

Well, yes, it was a bit heroic at that.


11

I'd never had an absecessed tooth before, and haven't had another since, thank goodness.  The follow-up root canal was tedious but not really painful... at least not relatively speaking.  But it was still a year or more before I felt really healthy and strong again. 

Why couldn't I have just had the flu?



*

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Where No Kindness Is (story)

*

[found on a park bench]
Where No Kindness Is
1

She was in her first year as Dean.  Three months after hiring her away from the little college in another state, President L---- had called to say that at the June Trustee meeting, he'd announced his intention to resign, effective in July of the following year.

She figured he'd only called her at all because of an incident during her interview in the Spring.  It was during her "Wrap-up Meeting with the President" before being driven back to the airport heading home to her husband and two children. 

"So," he said in a wrap-up kind of tone, "You've been here 48 hours or so, do you have any questions?"  She wasn't sure but suspected he asked mainly because one does that in a final interview meeting.

But he seemed visibly startled when she said, "Yes" and waited a second or two.  She had his attention:  "What are your own plans?" she asked.  "As a Vice President, when you leave I will be vulnerable or will feel vulnerable at least..."

He talked about being 62 and having always thought he wouldn't retire until he was at least 70.  She thought that would be okay, not planning herself to stay more than five or six years.

So the next June when he called the Dean-elect again, two weeks before her movers came, President L---- acknowledged he'd told her before that he had no plans to retire.  But he had been thinking lately that maybe he'd already accomplished his goals at V----- College and maybe he had other things to do elsewhere, perhaps in the ministry.

As she got to know her new colleagues in the first couple of weeks, from what they said she figured the Trustees had asked for President L----'s resignation.

2

Fortunately, there was only one faculty member up for tenure that first year, the kind of long-term decision usually made ultimately by a President.  She was familiar enough with the whole process, having gone through it herself at two different institutions, but she knew it would take some time to get a feel for how it played out in practice from the Dean's perspective at this new place.

Of course, anyone denied tenure would get a contract for one final year...to look for another position.

So she was lucky only one such decision would fall into her own, unsupported hands so soon.  As it turned out, President L---- was not only, as they say, "a lame duck."  It turned out he was literally absent much of the time.  No one knew if he was out of town or just laying low in the big colonial-style President's house on the hill above campus.  But he didn't show up for work except, unpredictably, now and then.

3

Assistant Professor Ben Jamison had been elected to one of the faculty committees whose weekly meetings the Dean herself was expected to attend.  This seemed to indicate a certain measure of confidence in Ben by his colleagues. 

Like the Dean herself, Ben tended to show up for the committee meetings on time.  That meant they had some time to chat, as the others arrived one by one.  He was cheerful, down-to-earth, pleasant.  He didn't seem to feel uncomfortable with her just because she was the new Dean.  He didn't say much in the meetings themselves, but he did seem to be well-prepared and paying attention, agreeable.

She happened to notice one day, and again the following week, that Ben had a little twitch in a shoulder or neck muscle.  One day when she arrived a minute later than usual, as members came in one by one, Ben was complaining to another committee member that his little twitch was annoying and a little distracting.  The other faculty member was from the Nursing program and advised him to consult his doctor's nurse practitioner.  She did not seem particularly concerned.

4
The first step in the tenure-review process occurred in mid-Fall, when the Dean and the Chair of the Faculty Tenure Committee met with the candidate - in this case, Ben Jamison - to make sure everyone was understanding things the same way and, especially, that the candidate understood what was expected of him: organizing peer visits to his classes, compiling a self-review report, and checking to see that his personnel file was up-to-date and complete by the submission deadline.

"If there was any question or negative comment in your mid-tenure review two years ago," the committee chair said - apparently as he had on many previous occasions - "then you need to discuss that in your self-evaluation."

Any questions? No? This little meeting lasted only five minutes or so.

The Dean had already reviewed Ben's file from two years before.  She noted that the summary letter concluded that Ben was making satisfactory progress to tenure.  He seemed, she thought, what her son would call a "slam dunk" for tenure.

5

After the holidays, Ben dropped into her office, apparently just for a friendly chat.  "How was your Christmas?"  "Did you travel at all?"  "Did you see family?"  Things like that.

But he did seem a bit distracted.  "You remember that I had that little twitch in my neck?" he said after a minute. 

"I do remember," she said sympathetically.  "Yes. Anything new?"

"I noticed over this last weekend," he said darkly, "that the same kind of twitch is now sometimes in my bicep....On the right."

She frowned.

"It's started to disturb my sleep," he added.  "So, this morning I made an appointment with my doctor in B-----" (the town where he lived 35 miles away).

"Ben, that's the right thing.  I hope he can tell you how to make it just go away."

"So, I'm asking your permission to leave campus right after class.  I'll be missing the committee meeting this afternoon."

"Don't give it another thought," she said.  "Your health comes first."

So, she said to herself: in his mind it was really a business meeting after all.  She thought most faculty would have just taken off, but Ben was evidently especially conscientious.  Good for him.

6


With the tenure and promotion decisions expected by mid-April, in late February the chairman of Ben Jamison's division set up a meeting to speak privately with the Dean.

"I didn't want to surprise you," A---- said, a burly cordial man with a raspy voice.  "About Ben Jamison."

"Oh, has something happened?"

"You know, as Chairman I have to submit a recommendation to the Tenure Committee."  The Dean nodded.  "I've talked it over with all our colleagues."

"Yes?"

"We're not going to support him," A----- said.  "He's well-liked by his students, so there may be some flack.  I know you like to avoid that sort of thing."

"What's happened?  I don't understand, A----, since his mid-probation review was all positive."  Dean D---- said.  "Wasn't it?"

"Well, I guess so but this is now.  My recommend will be to deny tenure.  We have to maintain high professional standards."

"This is surprising indeed," she said.  "The peer evaluations that have begun to come in have all been positive. ...Did you see them?"

"The Chairman has access to all the file.  I've just been looking them over."

"What are we missing, A----?  What do you folks know that the rest of us don't?"

"Yes," he said.  "Well, first of all that mid-probation letter came from your predecessor, the last Dean."  A---- smiled a little, "He was a cantankerous guy in many ways but on this one he told us he and President L---- didn't want to make a fuss.  Worried about the student retention situation, you know," he added.

"You mean Ben's weaknesses were glossed over?"

"We said at the time we had some reservations about his commitment to the College.  Did you see that?"

She hesitated.  "It didn't jump out at me, I'll have to say.  Did you say he may not have been making satisfactory progress?"  A---- began to shake his head No.  "...And tell him what he needed to do in order to earn your recommendation before this time around?"

"Not in the letter, no.  Somebody probably told him, confidentially you know.  I believe so."

"I'm getting a little uncomfortable about this, A----," Dean D------ said.  "What exactly were those of you in the division concerned about?  The same thing as now?"

"Oh, we've been very consistent.  Ben's a heck of a nice guy... but he lives out of town, did you know that?"  She nodded.  "He's got a business over there in his hometown.  He's told some of us - not me - that he makes more every year that way than in his work for the College altogether..."

"That does sound troubling," she said, "but..."

"It's just not right," the Chairman said.  "We have to depend on everyone we have.  If he's so damn popular, he ought to teach more."

"It's my impression that his student evaluations are pretty good, aren't they?"

"Yes, but you can't run a business and be a full-time faculty member too, can you?  It's not right!"

"What would you say, if you were me talking to him, and he said it was not fair that there's nothing in his file about this.  He wasn't formally told he'd have to change in order to get tenure."

"Oh," A---- said and sat back.  "That's not the way it works.  You don't have tenure until now, or after now I should say."  He smiled.  "Everybody knows that."

7

The last thing A---- said that day was that he'd already put the Committee's letter in the campus mail.

A month later, the Chair of the Tenure Committee came in to review for the Dean the Committee's upcoming recommendations.  The two first-year reviews were fine, no problems there, she said.  The three mid-probation reviews were okay too, but there was some concern about one person's ability to get students to participate in class discussions and another person didn't seem to be involved in any scholarly research or professional development.

"Will your recommendations to the President declare these concerns?" Dean D------ interrupted her to ask.

The committee chair paused a moment.  "I guess it is a recommendation," she said, "Technically.  But it's really the College's communication to the probationer saying everything's OK, or not."

"But you won't neglect to formally declare any areas for improvement to be made, will you?  It needs to be noted right in the file, doesn't it?"

The Chair shifted in her chair.  "That's hard to do with your faculty colleagues, you know?"

"Yes," the Dean said.  "But it's an important responsibility... The President's final letter can't very well just dump in some criticisms that haven't been mentioned before by anybody."

"We'll look at our letters again," the Chair said, "trying to find a tactful way of indicating our reservations.  I can see what you're saying.  But there isn't usually a President's letter, by the way.  Just the Committee's."

"What have you heard about Ben's health?" the Dean asked, changing the subject.

"Well, we aren't talking about that in committee, but A---- said at lunch the other day that Ben was getting frustrated, not knowing.  Anyway, though, you know we won't be giving him tenure.  He's got his other business and all that."

"But your recommendation will say something tactful about that, right?"

8

"M---," the Dean thought Ben Jamison seemed agitated (she almost thought he looked scared).  Most faculty used her first name, M---, but that was unusual for Ben.

"M---, I've been to two doctors now.  A second opinion, you know?  About this damn nervous twitch.  They've had some tests and everything."

The Dean felt sorry for him.  "Oh, Ben...," she said but waited for more.

"In the Easter break," he went on, "I'm going to Chicago to see a neurologist specialist.  I won't have to miss any classes."

"What are they worried about?" she asked.  "Something serious?"

"They say it's too early--," his voice got husky.  He cleared his throat, "--Too early to know if it's anything to worry about, too early to tell.  They don't know.  So I'm having a special kind of blood test right away," he said sitting back a little.  "They have to send it to some special lab.  To see if there's anything genetic, I guess," he said.  "Before the specialist sees me in Chicaqgo."

"Ben, you have a lot of friends here, you know.  We'll have our fingers crossed."

"Okay," he said.

9

When she got her copy of the Committee's negative tenure letter, the day before the spring break started, she called Ben's office but he was already gone.  He would have gotten a copy.  She said on his Voice Mail that they should sit down together when he got back.  "Good luck, Ben," she said.  There was no answer at his home.

She got through to A----, Ben's Division Chair.  "I'm concerned about Ben Jamison," she said.  "He seemed worried about his health last time I saw him..."

"He said he was taking off an hour or so ago," A---- chuckled; "I think I'm the only one left in the building.  And I'm fixing to leave too."  After a second, he added; "Oh, the Committee's denying tenure, I heard."

"Do you think we could put that process on hold while he sorts out his health problem?"

"No.  That's never been done."

She reached the Tenure Committee Chair at home.  She also said the process had to follow the schedule in the Faculty Handbook, or they could be sued.  "I don't think he'll be surprised, by the way.  I don't know him, just to say Hi to, but others on the Committee say it won't be a big deal."

10

So the Dean wasn't surprised when Ben showed up in her office the morning after break.  This time there was no chit-chat.

"When I asked you to come by--," she was starting to say when Ben broke in.  She later concluded he had not yet heard her Voice Mail.  He'd come straight from the parking lot to her.

"What?" he said.

"No, you go ahead," she said.

He said he'd been to the Chicago specialist.  He had ALS, 'Lou Gehrig's disease.'

"It's fatal, M---," Ben said.  And he looked scared, out of breath a little, a little flushed.  Not sad or feeling sorry for himself, or even angry.  Just scared.

"What can be done, Ben?" M--- asked.  She was usually acutely conscious of how she would seem to her listener, how her attitude and manner would be interpreted...  Later, she realized that talking with Ben that day, she'd not been thinking about that kind of thing, not at all.

He was already started on an extensive drug therapy program.  He couldn't perceive any difference yet, except that he was sleeping better.  That was good in itself.  The course of the disease could not be predicted.  It had moved pretty quickly from no symptoms to his current state with the neck twitch now and then and, less often, the funny little tickle in his bicep.  But the disease had stopped progressing a couple of months ago.

"So we don't have to worry about my classes this term," he said.

"Are you sure, Ben?" she said.  "You don't want to overdo..."

"No, all I'm saying is next year, next fall," he was speaking calmly in a matter-of-fact tone.  "Next term I may have to cut back a course."  He was starting to stand to leave.  "I'll give you enough notice," he said.

"Do you have family there in B------, Ben?"

"My daughter helps run the family farm 30-35 miles away.  She says she'll check in with me now and then."  He turned back to face her: "But I don't know about the future, M---.  I just don't."


11


Surprisingly, the President was in that day.  She told him she wanted him "as the President" to tell Ben in a formal letter for the file that the tenure review process was officially suspended until his health situation was resolved.  There was no benefit to denying tenure to a dying man.

The look on L----'s face showed how opposed he was to this bright idea from the new Dean.  "What does the Division Chair say?  Who is it this year: A----?"

She hadn't spoken with A---- or the Tenure Committee Chair, she said.

"Well, see if they think we could do this...if we wanted to.  I think it can't be done.  It would undermine the Committee." 

She told him the division chair and the committee chair didn't seem likely to budge.  It seemed hard to believe.  But she would try.

L----'s manner said clearly he was through with this distasteful issue for today.  She could reach him, he said, any time, through his secretary.  "We'll talk again."

12

So, they did nothing.

Ben came in again a month into the summer.  His daughter was waiting in the car.  He would not be able to teach in the Fall after all, he said.  He was sorry to let the College down.  His doctors said sometimes there was a period of remission, but it was unpredictable.  And the Fall semester was definitely out.

She went out to the car with him to meet the daughter.  "Your Dad is to have a leave of absence for the Fall," she said.  "With pay.  Will you, Ben, keep me up-to-date?"

He said he would, of course.  The daughter made eye contact as if to say she herself would keep M--- informed.

Later that day M--- told A---- the sad news, and by September they were able to cover Ben's courses with a minimum of trouble. 

No one was saying anything about the tenure denial.  M--- told her husband she couldn't tell if Ben's daughter even knew.

13

The next thing she knew, early in the fall, she learned Ben had died.

It popped into her head at that moment that Huckleberry Finn said, about some heinous event he'd witnessed, that it made him ashamed of the whole human race.  It seemed appropriate to the Dean that she'd thought of that remark just then.


*